
I had my chimney swept today.
Oh sorry! Is that not politacally correct? Perhaps I sholud rephrase that.I am not homophobic.
In fact I admire the confident ones who party just as hard as anyone else and take great pride in their appearance. But to get back to my post...
As I love chatting ( almost as much as I love Julie), I engaged in social conversatio with my chimney sweep. (Why aren't they called chimney sweepers? Is there such a thing as a chimney sweepee?) It turns out that he has read about his profession ( no - the day one!) and told me that parents sold their boys for £2, when £2 was a grand sum of money. They would work very long hours in dark ( obviously) and horrid conditions and sleep on bags of soot.
I pondered:' I wonder ( or ponder) what would happen to the boys when they were too big to climb inside chimneys'. To which sweep ( or was it sooty?) said ' They just threw them out onto the streets. Now, I remember from reading Dickens that they fed the boys very little to keep them weak and to stop them from fighting back. They were fed a nasty potion which tasted revolting and kept their appetite down.
So they wouldn't have grown too big too quickly and would not have been capable of very hard manual labour, so perhaps they turned to crime or begging or joined the army.
Sweep then said 'Most of them died of lung cancer'. That's something that I hadn't thought about. It was a very sobering thought. They were just pieces of meat bought to do a job then cast away. Child slavery was ripe in Victorian times but when people like Dickens tried to change things it didn't happen overnight. The vested interests had their way and child slavery existed for a long time after that.
If this sounds like a history lesson then I apologise . Yet, I know that nothing has really changed in human nature. Unscrupulous employers will still try to make as big a profit as they can without regard to the health or safety of their employers. In other countries child labour still exists. What pressure do we put on those countries? It's not for the benefit of the vested interests.
I am not a political activist, but if I were, I'd probably be a petticoat revolutionary.
Julie
xx